Posted on 05/31/2016 8:13:20 PM PDT by Nachum
All along Hillary Clinton has pled that when it comes to her violation of Federal regulations, she was at worst naive, hardly malicious and - as of recently - merely doing what each of her state department predecessors has done; and she has been very careful to make it clear that she never purposefully and intentionally "stripped" confidential data in order to send it through her unsecured server as such an act would imply not only a breach of email retention policy, but a willful abuse of confidential documents.
Well, moments ago Wikileaks unveiled what it believes may be the FBI's "smoking gun" in its case against Hillary. In a tweet, Wikileaks highlights one specific email and asks "Is this email the FBI's star exhibit against Hillary Clinton ("H")? "
The email in question (link)
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
True. But the fact that it is Wikileaks indicating they think it is a smoking gun of Hillary’s criminality makes it very hard for RATS and media types to ignore it anymore (which they have largely done.)
Headers like “Wikileaks exposes Hillary as a Criminal.”
Might make it happen.
Another point she will make:
(http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-department-releases-more-clinton-emails-several-marked-classified/)
“according to the Associated Press, the State Department said a review showed that the document in question was sent ‘apparently by secure fax, after all,’ and was never was sent to Clinton by email.”
That is, she will say the order to de-classify was never given - and see? nothing like that was ever executed.
Here is what Jacob Sullivan e mailed to Hillary:
If they can’t,turn into non-paper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.
Seems pretty clear obvious criminal activity.
IMO, this is why Cheryl Mills had 7 lawyers with her for the JW depo, all paid for by the Clintons. They objected to all the questions about Pagliano because he cut a deal and they know he is singing; perhaps leading the FBI to the deleted emails he stashed in cloud storage somewhere. This is a very dangerous time for Hillary and her minions. They have not been charged with anything and they don't really know what the FBI knows. They have to assume the FBI recovered everything. Did they keep a copy of everything they deleted? They seemed to be naive enough to think deleting them would hide them from the FBI. They could be completely blindsided with evidence the FBI has that they no longer have copies of. If your a defense lawyer, that is a very BAD spot to be in. Every word they say is potentially incriminating. I don't see the Clintons weaseling out of this. This is a bit more serious than ruining an interns blue dress. Their naiveté' and ignorance of technology is going to be their downfall.
Are you certain she is personally paying for those attorneys. Remember these are the cheapskates who take deductions for used undies and took whitehouse belongings with them. My guess Kendall is being paid by the foundation. Those at mills dispo were paid by the taxpayers except for her own attorney perhaps.
Not certain I suppose. Clintons always intertwine their personal, professional and criminal activities to the point you can't tell what is going on. Kendall may be being paid by the Foundation. Same as being paid for by the Clintons. Cheryl Wilkinson was supposedly there as Mills attorney. I read somewhere prior to the deposition that Clinton's were paying for attorneys to represent Mills. Kendall was the only name directly mentioned in that article.
It’s just as clear as if the Justice department decided to sue Citibank,or Bank Of America knowing they would not want to spend years in court litigating and would rather settle.
So the Justice Dept. Writes the settlement to say these banks pay billions of dollars,not to the poor people who lost homes in the so called bundling of mortgages,but to the Justice Department itself so they could pay out the billions to left wing community organizing groups like Laraza,after of course skimming 3% off the top for themselves,all of thus with NO Congressional or treasury dept oversight.
Imagine if A Trump Justice Dept doing this and giving the money to the NRA or Judicial Watch
Wikileaks is anti-American. They want Hillary to win.
Nice work, particularly the FJB son in law description!
I thought that she doesn’t know how to send emails.SARC!
Trump needs to win beyond the margins of stealability and then not go McConnell and fall in line with the establishment.
I know everyone thinks she’s untouchable, but the fact that Trump looks like he might pound her into a grease stain may mean Obama will sic the dogs on her to get her off the ticket.
Thx for posting
That is still a felony. The subject, itself is usually a basis for classification.
I have rigorously protected classified knowledge for the last 50+ years -- and I would gladly volunteer to be on the firing squad for anyone who trashed US security the way the witch did.
You’re correct of course (unless the sanitizer is authorized, which I doubt Sullivan is).
But, IMHO, most of her current LIV’s won’t care - the line, in their minds, is too fine.
Hard to believe that anyone at that level of gov is that darned stupid isn’t it?
But criminals do stupid things.
Why are some animals more equal than others?
I would be doing ten years at Leavenworth by now.
5.56mm
Unfortunately, when they asked Hillary about "wiping the server" and she replied "like with a towel", I don't think that was an act. I believe she is that naive about technology. She carried a Blackberry everywhere she went, not realizing she was enabling anyone to track her whereabouts.
That's like asking if there is an invisible outfit that the emperor could wear that would make people see that he is naked.
Answer: NO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.