To: ColdOne
And the WSJ used to be a respectable paper...
To: Cowboy Bob
“And the WSJ used to be a respectable paper...”
You can remember further back than I can.
To: Cowboy Bob
I used to get put off at the crazed rantings of Cockburn back in the day.
His leftist scrivenings seem almost "normal" compared to the current opinionators they carry nowadays.
To: Cowboy Bob
WSJ and Goldman Sacks wasted so much on Cruz. These guys really are kind of cheap.
82 posted on
05/30/2016 12:37:15 PM PDT by
Bogie
(Just a coincidence?)
To: Cowboy Bob
The Wall Street Journal, from Bartley on, has always been filled with open borders fetishists.
There are a handful of decent folks on the editorial side, e.g. James Taranto, John Fund, but they're few and far between.
96 posted on
05/30/2016 1:09:34 PM PDT by
OddLane
To: Cowboy Bob
>>And the WSJ used to be a respectable paper...
...and it still is, for people who no longer believe that the American worker has a place in the American Dream.
97 posted on
05/30/2016 1:14:09 PM PDT by
Bryanw92
(If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
To: Cowboy Bob
And the WSJ used to be a respectable paper... Yes, before Rupert Murdoch bought it.
149 posted on
05/30/2016 7:27:35 PM PDT by
SGNA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson