I don’t agree with Milo’s open, militant homosexuality, but he has valid points on free speech. That he was denied the security protection that he PAID for is egregious enough without a professor denying free speech.
You can't change people from being gay once they become gay (whatever causes it) and I don't want to make gays go in the closet. I want them open so my girls don't marry a closeted fag who cheats on them with men on the weekends.
As long as society is safeguarded against gay depredation on kids (which heteros also do) - let the fags be.
I don't know who the guy is, and now that I know he's queer, who cares? Announcing it just causes normal people to discount him.
The irony of Milo. He would have been under a protected status if he were espousing left wing ideology but since he goes against the left, the left is out for his blood. I think he is tremendously courageous.
You have to give him credit. Whether you like him or not, he will debate in a civilized manner, unlike the leftist groups who will do nothing but scream and have a violent hissy fits.
in the words of the perfessor: “Free speech is MY speech; if you don’t agree in full with it, SHUT UP!”
I’ve known quite a few gays that that are conservative fiscally at least, as they have businesses and pay taxes too. They don’t make a living out of activism and lawsuits because they are gay.
Hoax in progress? Noose found on DePaul campus after @Nero visit https://t.co/ln5s8QFQGW— John Newton (@TelcoJ) May 27, 2016
He is open, but not militant. He has even indicated it may be a choice, at least form him, and he thinks the militants are not helping their own cause.