I think the state government had to apply something evenly across the state.
Anyway, this sure is bringing the rabid squirrels out of everyone’s attics, isn’t it?
“I think the state government had to apply something evenly across the state.”
For private businesses, I agree. But for a bunch of voters who are happy about men in the women’s areas? I’m not sure. Why not a law that says state money for publicly owned facilities will be pulled if a jurisdiction within the state goes nuts and mandate’s men in the women’s within publically owned facilities in their jurisdiction? Seems like that would apply evenly across the state.
Freegards