Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01

Sorry, Twerp. I was studying the Constitution most probably before you were born. Cruz would not have been eligible then and he is not eligible now. There has never been an Article 5 Convention to change the meaning of Article II, Section 1, clause 5. There is an enormous difference between Citizen of the united States and NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States.
The Framers of the Constitution INTENDED that there be a difference and that is why they CHANGED the proposed wording of CITIZEN to NATURAL BORN CITIZEN on the advice of John Jay, Future First Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. EVERYONE on the Committee KNEW what it meant and its source was the same as Article I, Section 8, Clause 10 which cites the Law of Nations.
My position is absolutely correct as is Harley Lady’s. YOU cannot defend your position with FACTS! We can. CASE CLOSED!


52 posted on 05/22/2016 8:50:07 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Mollypitcher1
YOU cannot defend your position with FACTS! We can. CASE CLOSED!

All-Caps don't make it right. You're still wrong.

83 posted on 05/22/2016 1:45:26 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson