Posted on 05/21/2016 8:39:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
It is not considered polite to mention it, but Obama observers have ignored a great deal of evidence that the president of the United States was abused at approximately age ten and afterwards, in a way that would be criminal under American and European law. This whole topic should be out of bounds for political debate, but now the grown up Barack Obama has issued an edict to American school systems, which are responsible for the welfare of millions of children in this country. It is legally unprecedented that the president would direct whether schoolchildren should able to enter bathrooms reserved for a different gender. It is Obama himself who has now pushed what Freud called psychosexual development onto the political stage, where it does not belong.
Medically and scientifically, the credibility of children's beliefs about their own sexuality has no foundation in evidence. Sexual development has been studied in psychiatry and psychology since the 19th century, usually by way of case histories. But our truly reliable evidence is near zero. Any nationwide policy affecting the psychosexual development of children is therefore absurd and irresponsible on its face. Nobody knows for sure, because there is no scientific standard for sexual identity. Some studies of so-called "sex change" surgery show high failure rates. Until recently, no medical doctor would have authorized any unproven treatment for an underage individual. The Obama edict therefore has no medical or scientific basis, to say the least.
The only explanation that makes sense comes from the young Barry Soetoro's own life story.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Obama seethes with hatred.
+1
The first time I ever read it I knew exactly what it was about. Sickening.
Yeah, but the number one contributor to Obama’s mental issues is the fact that he was abandoned by both parents.
There is no need to resort to theories about sexual abuse when you have a transsexual mother figure at hand. He is probably quite fond of his nanny and crafts policies based on how he would like his former nanny to be treated.
This would explain some things. Obama was saddled with an absent, uncaring father, a distracted, ignorant mother, and a lazy maternal grandfather was mooched off his wife. It’s interesting how Obama dismissed his maternal grandmother as a “typical white person” when she may have been the only decent person in his childhood. Then as an aimless young man, he was easily indoctrinated by Chicago radicals like Billy Ayres and Bernadine Dohrn.
Shared the tranny’s bedroom? Well, now we know why he’s homosexual.
Sounds like he hated his father.
They’re mad about the tranny bathroom decree?
She was days away from dying when he visited her? Guess he didn’t care for her, either. Sounds like the no-empathy reaction. When did she break her hip?
Not to put too fine a point on it, but:
‘Obama was known as the “boy who runs like a duck.”’
http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/SoetoroDunhamMarriage.htm
He was raised as a Muslim? When did he convert to Christianity?
What’s it about?
He was raised as a Muslim? When did he convert to Christianity?
_________________________
You’re joking. Right? :)
Obama exhibits all the traits of a full bore malignant narcissist. It certainly wouldn’t have to be sexual abuse, but it is difficult to create a malignant narcissist with no abuse at all.
In a sane country, Zero would never have been allowed near any positions of power or authority.
I’m not treating him. It would be inappropriate to diagnose clinical narcissism. It doesn’t require a diagnosis to say that he probably liked his tranny nanny.
If I’ve read that before, I’ve forgotten.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.