Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GilGil

It was the US through missile smuggling through Benghazi.

Because we were arming “the good extremists,” right, Hillary?


3 posted on 05/19/2016 8:39:12 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
........the Clintons are more than willing to take money from oppressive regimes for their personal gain. W/ Hillary in the State Dept catbird seat, arms sales enhanced military might and power of Muslim (terrorist) countries. Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar are Clinton foundation and Library donors.....countries singled out by the State Dept, itself, for corruption, civil liberties violations, and violent crackdowns against political opponents.........

Massive dollar amounts (said to be $100 million from Saudi Arabia alone) were donated to the Clintons by Mideast potentates....the money bought them Clinton cooperation for their Islamic goals....at the expense of US national security and the safety and security of Americans.

Ethics and the Clintons rarely intersect. That’s a given. It’s well known that the Clintons are more than willing to take money from oppressive regimes. Hillary's State Department formally approved arms sales even as many of the deals enhanced the military power of countries ruled by authoritarian regimes whose human rights abuses had been criticized by the department.

Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar all donated to the Clinton Foundation and gained State Department clearance to buy caches of American-made weapons even as the department singled them out for a range of alleged ills, from corruption to restrictions on civil liberties to violent crackdowns against political opponents.

The Clintons can be induced to abandon all principles if the price is right: Four oil-rich Arab nations, all with histories of philanthropy to United Nations and Middle Eastern causes, have donated vastly more money to the Clinton Foundation than they have to most other large private charities involved in the same kinds of global work championed by the Clinton family.

Since 2001, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates gave hundreds of millions to the Clintons and to the Clinton Foundation. In contrast, six similar non-governmental global charities collected no money from those same four Middle Eastern countries; the International Committee of the Red Cross was given $6.82 million.

The existence of foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation has been well-documented in the media. What has not been revealed, however, is the disparity in donations by these four nations, all of which have been criticized by the State Department over the years for a spate of issues ranging from the mistreatment of women to stoking ethnic discord in the flammable Middle East.

SOURCE http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3378985/posts

ADDENDUM New evidence is surfacing about the role of Saudi Arabia in
9/11. Of course, the Clintons (and Obama) "know nothing" about that (snx).

80 posted on 05/20/2016 4:52:33 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson