Krauthammer: Trump Supreme Court List Will Have A "Dramatic Effect" In Unifying Republicans

Breitbart.com ^ | May 19,2016 | Jeff Poor

[Biggirl]

Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted to the list put forth by presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump of who he is considering to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court should he be elected president.

[Qiviut]

When Charles made that statement, he showed his absolute ignorance, the extent of his TDS, and what remaining respect for him I did have, vanished. He might as well have gotten into the bowl of Cheetos dust with Beck, as far as I’m concerned.

[central_va]

Globalist Free Traitors&153 are getting the message.

[KC_Conspirator]

He has become a sad sack. Never thought I would say that.

[RaginRak]

he didn’t promise anyone a job....as far as I can see..

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Bingo !

[TontoKowalski]

I'd lay down my life with anyone who will fight with reckless abandon to stop the murderous hemorrhage of our own innocent, unborn, American blood. It's not a political issue. It's the damnation of our nation.

I appreciate that. I believe the path to halting abortion runs through the courts... the Court has mandated that as a "right" and only the Court can reverse.

Given this list, and Trump referred to them all as "prolife"... and I haven't independently researched so I'm taking him at his word... there is still a way for you to come aboard.

PS. Even if you don't take him at his word, you have to acknowledge that if her were lying about this, we'd know about it immediately from conservative Court advocacy groups. As far as I know, the list has been universally applauded.

[miss marmelstein]

I doubt it too!

[Theophilus]

the Court has mandated that as a "right" and only the Court can reverse.

Our Free Republic of the United States of America was not instituted to be governed by the unelected courts.

[miss marmelstein]

No, who are you voting for president? We only have two candidates at this point.

[Balding_Eagle]

Are you serious?

Sit out the Presidential election, I could give two hoots.

Trump has said that he not only doesn’t need you, he has said he doesn’t want you.

But, I will tell you this; I will get to tell my grandkids that I voted for the president who made SCOTUS reliably pro-life, and you’ll have to admit you turned your back on him.

So much for your piety.

[kiltie65]

I love the “sour kraut” designation. LOL

[FreedomNotSafety]

I agree with Anne. There are just two things to get right and nothing else matters in comparison to them. They are: 1. Immigration and 2. The picks for the Supreme Court.

I think Trump’s wall is metaphorical and reflects his willingness to control our border. This list though is tangible and beyond dispute and I cannot see any reason he will not abide by it.

He has my vote. I don’t agree with him on many things but this list seals the deal for me.

Now Bernie for VP! Why not? Seal the election, get the SC picks made, half illegal and harmful immigration. After that we can slug it out left versus right.

[miss marmelstein]

I vary that with Dr. Strangelove - his name in left wing corridors.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Looks like Kraut is coming to the party.

[Theophilus]

Before every election, I go to the Kentucky Secretary of State's website to diligently research the ballot for every office. There is not one up there for 8 November 2016 yet, but I'll keep checking.

[Theophilus]

Sit out the Presidential election, I could give two hoots.

Neither I, nor my large and growing family ever sit out any elections. I did miss a primary once because I was on business travel and did not get a chance to early vote. I was ashamed.

[miss marmelstein]

Huh?

Probably the green, libertarian and communist parties will be available for your delectation.

[drop 50 and fire for effect]

Well put, as Reagan put it, “trust, but verify.” Once we see an actual nomination, then I’ll believe.

Trump may be a liberal in a lot of things, but, as Rush has frequently noted, he is not ideological. He is not a statist or a socialist, which are the only options coming from the Democrat Party.

[Theophilus]

Hey I encourage you to vote with all your intellect and might! If we are accountable to God for every idle word, then how much more so are we accountable for the sacred duty of our votes?

Matthew 12:36
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

[tumblindice]

"Maybe we’ll find out whether it’s a bill of goods next year." Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves?