Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fruser1

It referes to independantly developed intel that could not be used against the protected person of Mohammad Atta. Gorelick’s Wall was not the issue at hand and played no role here.


42 posted on 05/15/2016 7:11:52 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: PIF

Your post 17 makes no mention of how he was “inpedendantly” protected. It only refers to not being able to go after him because of the illegality of information sharing. Maybe provide link to full article if you have it.


44 posted on 05/15/2016 7:15:50 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: PIF; bobsunshine

More links on this site:

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=68941


46 posted on 05/15/2016 7:21:48 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson