I would read what the Honduran Supreme Court has to say, but I can't read Spanish. This leaves me having to rely on other people's analysis. However, I am not going to take the word of random people on complex legal questions. The Law Library of Congress does have the competency to analyze the question and has no discernible bias in addressing the issue. The Obama administration
did have a bias that eventually got revealed.
then you cannot simultaneously claim it was done in accordance with the Honduran Constitution.
My claim is that the removal was in accord with the constitution of Honduras, with a single exception, what to do with an ousted and semi-popular president that was attempting to set himself up as a dictator.
Your claim is that it was a military coup d'etat backed by Hillary Clinton and that he was flown to a US military base. I can find utterly no evidence to back a single aspect of that assertion.