Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

Trump would be well advised to resist the impulse to respond, and just ignore her. Let his attack dogs respond to Clinton’s. If he responds personally it diminishes him as a nominee, and elevates Wareen.


23 posted on 05/09/2016 2:31:37 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clintonh8r
Trump would be well advised to resist the impulse to respond, and just ignore her. Let his attack dogs respond to Clinton’s.

Do you think Don Rickles would take the job?


28 posted on 05/09/2016 2:35:35 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: clintonh8r

Trump would do far better to go toe to toe with her.

She made a career pretending to be Cherokee when the reality was that her family rounded them up for the trail of tears.

Crackerjawea has a glass jaw, and even a butterfly could give her a knockout blow.

We are about to enter a more full blown war with Islam, and the era of metro sexual candidates needs to end with Mitt. Stop asking candidates to be pansies.


39 posted on 05/09/2016 2:43:54 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: clintonh8r

Ordinarily I would agree that it is good to just ignore leftist lies and ad hominem. But Bush did that and it cost a great deal. Without refutation, the Gobbrls Drmocrsp Big Lie technique eventually warps the public mind. And besides, it will be so much fun to watch Trump scalp the fake injun squaw. ha ha!


54 posted on 05/09/2016 3:05:53 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: clintonh8r
"Trump would be well advised to resist the impulse to respond, and just ignore her. Let his attack dogs respond to Clinton’s. If he responds personally it diminishes him as a nominee, and elevates Warren."

I agree. Donald should not engage in the Indian-wrestling. He should rather stick to calling her "goofus" or "goofy". He might also mention that Warren claims to have "created the intellectual foundation" for the OWS movement. It's too tempting to say that those occupiers slept in teepees, because the urge to lay-on the Indian stuff is irresistible. We heard it all during the Scott Brown vs Warren campaign. The residents of "massachusetts", the "land over the blue hills" kept up this "liawatha" stuff 24/7 for months. Brown got smoked. She's not even from mass. Donald can depend on his following to lay on the Indian stuff. He shouldn't. He seems to excell at labeling an opponent. "Goofus" is perfect.

59 posted on 05/09/2016 3:25:03 PM PDT by HandyDandy (Don't make up stuff. It wastes time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson