Replies

EXCERPT---What Pagliano Likely Knows / Bryan Pagliano can shed light on several issues:

<><> Pagliano’s dual role as 1) a tax-paid US government employee, and, 2) Hillary's personal employee, opens a whole new arena for investigation, similar the ongoing scrutiny of Hillary aide, Huma Abedin (Huma worked simultaneously for 1) the State Department, 2) the Clinton Foundation, 3) Hillary herself, and, Teneo---a private company closely tied to both Clintons. She also billed herself as a "private consultant."

<><> What was Pagliano’s day-to-day State Dept job? What did he actually do, not just his job description, but actual work accomplishments? Is there a paper trail showing he did any actual work at all, or was the State “job” just a make-work position to get him on the tax-paid payroll in return for his services to Clintons?

<><> Pagliano listed himself on LinkedIn as a political-appointee saying he “Serves as strategic advisor and special projects manager to the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) / Deputy Chief Information Officer (DCIO) overseeing the operations of the Information Resource Management (IRM) bureau.”

<><> Pagliano beingemployed at such a high level inside State’s IT structure assures that State’s most senior info officers knew about Clinton’s email setup, and apparently did not, or were not, able to stop it. Unless Brian never told his supervisor about his "other" job.

<><> What was going on inside the State Department vis-a-vis Hillary's email server? Who knew about it? When did they know? Was it ever vetted/approved, and if so, by whom?

<><> Were objections raised by security personnel and how were those objections dealt with? Who is on the complete list of people who had email addresses on the server?

<><> What discussions took place inside State regarding the presence of classified information on the server? Were objections ever raised from outside State, say from the White House or the intel community?

<><> Pagliano can also speak to 1) what security measures if any were in place on Clinton’s server, and, 2) when they were instituted.

<><> Tech-savvy Pagliano had visibility into Hillary's server logs, showing any attacks or penetrations into the server.

<><> Pagliano, as a State Department employee under Hillary, had access to the State Department computer systems.

<><> Pagliano currently works as a computer contractor for State, and still has access to State Department computer systems. Has he ever been asked by Clinton to use his positions to gain information she would ordinarily not have access to, or to which she did not want her name attached?

<><> Pagliano may have knowledge of where any backups of the server are, shedding light on what emails were deleted by Clinton before her “full disclosure” of what was in fact a highly curated batch of documents.

CONCLUSIONS There is a lot to learn from Bryan Pagliano. His testimony could be like when the Feds turn a Mafia accountant, a low-level guy with access to the family jewels.

========================================

BONUS: WRT the State Department’s Chief Information Officer, who should have stopped the Clinton email server? Well, well, she retired from State a few months before Hillary left, into a nice job at the IMF. It pays to be a winner!

SOURCE: See more at: http://wemeantwell.com/blog/tag/bryan-pagliano/#sthash.7unm1UiJ.dpuf

Thank you WildHighlander57. I've thought this email/server/Clinton Foundation thing was totally criminal from the get go. Now that we have proof the Russians got in she should discontinue her Presidental run.

She created a National Security/Defense nightmare that only the higher ups know the severity of, not to mention the costs of redoing our whole computer systems, IT networks, software, military loose ends - you could go on and on. Probably trillions. How many of our best agents died? How many hundreds of thousands of people in the ME murdered, raped, displaced and now in refugee camps?

It boggles the mind that 1. She's even running for President. Think about it, a career criminal with at least 500 years of indictable offenses, and 2. She's not immediately ending her campaign displays she has not one ounce of integrity or character. A better person would be holding a press conference, announcing she is no longer running for President, give a sincere apology to the nation and turn herself in to the US Marshals Service right then and there.

She can slog on but then she'll be defeated in a landslide. After Comey announces and Lynch does nothing then the leaks from the FBI will start. Trump will decimate her in the debates and otherwise in the campaign.

Will justice finally be done with the Clintons?