Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COUNTrecount

I know why they’re doing this: to keep the social conservative vote. However, baff-a-room bills of whatever variety should be left to the states, just like defining marriage should have been before five black-robed dictators pulled that ruling out of their arses.


106 posted on 05/09/2016 3:12:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yep, and that’s what will happen here. There should’ve been a constitutional amendment to define marriage while the country overwhelmingly agreed on what it should be. Our side needs to be MUCH MORE active in fixing correct moral values into a solid legal form, not less.


114 posted on 05/09/2016 3:15:03 PM PDT by JediJones (Looks like those clowns in Congress did it again. What a bunch of clowns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson