![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XOil1Kn2AaQ/VhlWlrxqwPI/AAAAAAAALXE/JQPFS3n1g3k/s1600/fri3117.jpg)
She's either a pathetic, drunken, drugged, senile, old hag ... or a pathological liar ... or both.
1 posted on
05/08/2016 1:30:51 PM PDT by
Zakeet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Zakeet
“No one has reached out to me.”
“They wouldn’t dare!”
2 posted on
05/08/2016 1:31:19 PM PDT by
Pearls Before Swine
(The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
To: Zakeet
She’s a lawyer.
What does “reach out” really mean..?
Who knows.
3 posted on
05/08/2016 1:31:59 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: Zakeet
That image is a fact. Her saying this means they have.
4 posted on
05/08/2016 1:32:46 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
To: Zakeet
Praying they reach out soon. To snap on the cuffs.
5 posted on
05/08/2016 1:34:00 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Zakeet
She sure does repeat this a lot. Almost every day. Maybe she’s just wishing that it’s all going to blow over or can’t “recall” ever saying it.
6 posted on
05/08/2016 1:34:23 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's time to TRUMP the race card in America so we can all get along again.)
To: Zakeet
There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me, and I look forward to this being wrapped up.".....................yeah riiiiiight.
7 posted on
05/08/2016 1:35:05 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
To: Zakeet
Trump says democrats will always tell you the opposite of what is true.
8 posted on
05/08/2016 1:36:36 PM PDT by
McGruff
(#DumpRyan - Tell Paul Ryan, you're fired!)
To: Zakeet
Maybe they contacted her lawyer but not Clinton directly ??
Did they ask about her aides testifying ?
9 posted on
05/08/2016 1:37:18 PM PDT by
erlayman
(yw)
To: Zakeet
Clinton’s lawyer Vincent Foster could not be reached for comments at this time.
10 posted on
05/08/2016 1:42:06 PM PDT by
tflabo
(truth or tyrrany)
To: Zakeet
The FBI is setting up a perjury trap?
11 posted on
05/08/2016 1:42:18 PM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
To: Zakeet
12 posted on
05/08/2016 1:44:24 PM PDT by
tflabo
(truth or tyrrany)
To: Zakeet
“There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me...”
I see, resurrecting the original attempt to redefine the issue. Hilda, did any of the messages contained classified information? Who should know better than the SOS?
13 posted on
05/08/2016 1:45:27 PM PDT by
Magic Fingers
(Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
To: Zakeet
Well, would you want to reach out and touch her?
14 posted on
05/08/2016 1:46:16 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Zakeet
Why interview if you have massive evidence of gross negligence?
16 posted on
05/08/2016 1:49:19 PM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to youGo to trumps websites look at issues an)
To: Zakeet
There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me...
Not the issue—Did you facilitate or allow any government classified material to be processed, stored, transmitted or otherwise exposed through an unapproved / unsecured computer system, electronic system or computer server owned by you, on your property or maintained by persons not security cleared for that material?
And the “gotcha” coverall question: Do you have any other information that is relevant to this investigation which hasn’t already been disclosed? If your answer is “yes,” please state what that is.
17 posted on
05/08/2016 1:50:38 PM PDT by
Skybird
To: Zakeet
There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me Shrillary, you KNOW that markings don't determine how material is classified. It's the content.
You can keep repeating this meme, but it doesn't make it true.
It was YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to recognize if classified information was being handled outside secure channels, and report it to a security officer if you found out about it.
You were briefed on this, and you signed a document acknowledging it.
You received information that was specifically identified as sensitive from an uncleared person (Sid Blumenthal) that shouldn't have ever possessed it. But, you didn't report it.
You even told your staff to move information across the air gap from a secure system to your unsecure system, and remove the markings on it.
There are in people in prison RIGHT NOW for doing the same things you did. There are others that were lucky to only lose their clearance and their job.
To: Zakeet
Why hasn’t she been indicted yet?
To: Zakeet
She lies so easily. Sure it’s a security review, that’s taking all this time.
23 posted on
05/08/2016 2:02:25 PM PDT by
surrey
To: Zakeet
Sorry, Hill....they don’t “reach out” they subpoena... Idiot.
25 posted on
05/08/2016 2:07:34 PM PDT by
Shady
(We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
To: Zakeet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson