I understand the context of your statement. And you are correct that most proponents of Darwinism separate “abiogenesis” from Darwinian evolution.
But actual informed evolutionists do understand that it is a continuum without distinction as it is all simply physics-chemical processes.
Otherwise abiogenesis accepts the élan vital concept.
Certainly as a philosophical paradigm, but that has nothing to do with the science.
To understand the magnitude of the problem is to reject such fairy tales. Using terms like "simply physics-chemical processes" would constitute a breech of ethics were it not so commonplace.