To: papertyger
That's like saying static is designed into radios. We know static isn't designed into radios because we know how radios are designed. Are you claiming to know how life was designed?
22 posted on
05/06/2016 12:17:28 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
We know static isn't designed into radios because we know how radios are designed. Are you claiming to know how life was designed? Incorrect. We know static is the result of factors outside the signal to noise ratio. Your proposition is the equivalent of the static organizing itself into a coherent broadcast.
27 posted on
05/06/2016 12:23:41 PM PDT by
papertyger
(-/\/\/\-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson