Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2016 8:17:51 PM PDT by Fasceto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: Fasceto

I don’t think only that applies. The fact they were miss handled by Hillary after her original briefing rises to criminal status from what I remember.


143 posted on 05/06/2016 12:38:57 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

Her intent was clearly to evade public disclosure laws, not malice, and there is no need even to prove her real motive. The outcome though was obvious. Anyone in the business who didn’t think to hack her server would by now have been either fired or executed.

Malice is not a requirement for prosecution on this crime. I knew several people who “merely” mishandled Top Secret material who were prosecuted and imprisoned for the crime. It’s Hillary, so the rules don’t apply, but if she were a real person she’d already have been convicted.


144 posted on 05/06/2016 3:25:24 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

Just so much horse shit.
Intent has NO bearing.
I didn’t mean to kill him, just beat hell out of him.
Still going to jail for murder regardless.
Bitch Hill should already be behind bars.
Were it you or i we would be.


146 posted on 05/06/2016 3:36:04 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (500 years ago we had Shakesphere, obammys people live in mud huts still. Go figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto
I see you were zotted for your defense of Hillary.


147 posted on 05/06/2016 3:40:17 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto
The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the ongoing probe. An FBI spokesman and a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia declined to comment.

These unnamed "US officials" probably spoke on the condition of anonymity because they have no clue whatsoever how the probe is actually going and they're trying to "try the case in the court of public opinion".

That isn't going to happen and if you're too chickenshit to come out on the record, closeted "Shrillary!" supporter, don't expect me to believe you.

148 posted on 05/06/2016 3:40:58 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

Intent has no baring on the law.

Jim Snowden could say his intent in teleasing all his top secret info was not to hurt the US, well okay then here’s your pass.


150 posted on 05/06/2016 3:46:27 AM PDT by stockpirate (Rush is a low information talk show host concerning Ted sCruz and Marco foamboy Rubio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

so is avoiding FOIA malicious? I’d say so.


151 posted on 05/06/2016 4:47:07 AM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

The statute in question has NO PART that mentions intent.

Mishandling of classified material is a felony (IIRC) no matter if it is intentional or not.

And putting classified material in an “open” system speaks volumes about intent to commit espionage, IMO.


153 posted on 05/06/2016 5:03:41 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

What the hell has intent got to do with it. A person running a clearly-posted stop sign and killing a family in a subsequent car wreck didn’t have intent. So “not guilty?” Total disregard for the law and personal negligence are in play here, not intent.


154 posted on 05/06/2016 5:13:19 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

Intention to avoid accountability is malicious.

Period.

Full stop.

End of story.


157 posted on 05/06/2016 5:53:56 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper (Just say no to HRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

This is the new meme coming out of the White Hut. “She didn’t do on purpose, she meant no harm” So the Hillbots will give her a pass.


158 posted on 05/06/2016 8:00:19 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

This is the new meme coming out of the White Hut. “She didn’t do on purpose, she meant no harm” So the Hillbots will give her a pass.


159 posted on 05/06/2016 8:00:32 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

This is the new meme coming out of the White Hut. “She didn’t do on purpose, she meant no harm” So the Hillbots will give her a pass.


160 posted on 05/06/2016 8:00:40 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fasceto

Luckily the law doesn’t give a crap if she had malicious or any other type of intent. All that matters is that she did it.


161 posted on 05/06/2016 4:13:06 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (We need a separation of press and state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson