Posted on 05/05/2016 8:17:51 PM PDT by Fasceto
Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules, though they are still probing the case aggressively with an eye on interviewing Clinton herself, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
FBI agents on the case have been joined by federal prosecutors from the same office that successfully prosecuted 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui — and who would handle any Edward Snowden case, should he ever return to the country, according to the U.S. officials familiar with the matter. And in recent weeks, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia and their FBI counterparts have been interviewing top Clinton aides as they seek to bring the case to a close.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
There could be dozens of co conspirators.
Just how many people at State and the White House do you believe conspired in this felonious act of gross negligence?
“Officer, I had no malicious intent when I robbed that bank; I just wanted some easy money.”
doug, the sad part is millennials have no clue who or what she is, by design.
You’re wrong, intent does not matter. You or I did this we’d be in prison for 20 or more years already. Besides, just because one guy says no intent doesn’t mean that’s what everyone else thinks. It’s not that reliable a news source.
Faceto is no longer with us.
No malice, just stupidity. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
And she was NEVER ignorant of the laws.
There is no malicious intent when a drunk drives in to a school bus. It is still a crime.
We need to change that.
No Matter. It is a valid discussion for folks to say their peace.
>> intended to break classification rules
And neither do drunk drivers intend to kill.
Unreal.
Are you a troll?
Get a call to Rush this week and help him out.
Wait to see where he goes with this.
It’s hard to get the kids because they are tuned into social media and that’s it.
Looks like the admins agree with that assessment.
“I think the leak is being routed thru the DOJ to the administration which is managing and massaging the media message.”
And it’s interesting that whoever is doing it is actually changing the wording in the law to suggest that some sort of lack of “malicious intent” exemption exists in it when in fact it doesn’t. All to make Hillary look innocent of course. Nice try by whoever’s behind it, but it wouldn’t hold water in court.
Washington Post is privy.
a toilet located in a small shed outside a house or other building; an outhouse.
Mmm, mhm. Ok, Yep.
Security violation can occur regardless of intent, if you are not handling classified material according to the rules, which are designed to keep unauthorized people from having access.
She was using an unclassified home server for highly classified material, so it was not protected appropriately. Anyone could break into it, he was putting her convenience ahead of national security.
I think Hillary has mens rea.
Huma is that you?
Intent is not the point. Ineptitude and flagrant disregard for security policy and procedure IS.
The mere fact that she knew the rules for handling secure information and thwarted it without concern for the security of the American people was malicious and intentional.
This is so clearly irrelevant to the case it can only be intentional disinformation.
So the question is, are the folks at the post really so stupid that they fell for it, or are they consciously cooperating?
Honestly, either choice is completely plausible!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.