I agree that George H.W. Bush ran a terrible re-election campaign in 1992, but he would have won easily over Clinton that year if Perot hadn’t run as an Independent and taken 20% of the votes. Without Perot, a large majority of those votes would have gone to Bush.
Trump has 6 months to expose Hillary for the fraud, liar, and criminal that she is. I think by the time he’s done with her he’ll pull in most all Republicans, many Independents, some Democrats, and win easily by a 5-10% margin.
These never Trump people need to think about our US Supreme Court and reconsider to becoming never Hillary people.
I agree with all of what you said, except the part about the ‘92 campaign. My POV is that Perot would never have run without Bush being such a lying sack of shiite. Had he stayed reasonably true to his campaign promises, Perot would not have run and Bush would have been a 2-termer.
Oh, and Hillary Clinton would be the disbarred ex-con, ex-wife of the largely forgotten philandering ex-governor of a hick state who would be most famous as the answer to various trivia questions. So, in my view, George H.W. Bush is responsible for Hillary being the 2016 Dem nominee, and now he (and his family) clearly want her to win.