“Poor analogy. People who used witchcraft accusations as explanations for that which they didnt understand, or as a means for settling scores, fall into a category which is quite different than one who cannot accept his/her biological reality of sex.”
The superstitious witchcraft accusation and superstitious application of a mental illness accusation against all people who fall into a category of an artificial social category are both superstitions. You have no way of knowing with any certainty what your own or “his/her biological reality of sex” is in actuality without a comprehensive biological testing beyond the scope of nearly al or all medical facilities. If you try to deny that simple truth, try reporting your karyotype and SRY determination before moving on to further gene expressions.
you have no way of knowing with any certainty what your own or his/her biological reality of sex is in actuality without a comprehensive biological testing beyond the scope of nearly al or all medical facilities.
Now you're just pulling "facts" out of your vociferously opinionated backside.
As part of the standard course of prenatal care suggested by her obstetrician, my wife and I had genetic analysis done on ourselves and our child back in 2005.
So the sort of analysis you're claiming to be inaccessible has been, in fact, an increasingly common part of prenatal care for quite a while.
http://www.google.com/search?q=prenatal+genetic+testing
But facts like those don't prop up the cause for the "community" of prideful activists, do they.