Since the documentary is regarding the 2004 ALCS, why would it?
“Since the documentary is regarding the 2004 ALCS, why would it?”
Documentaries can be wide ranging or very limited, but neither Schilling or I have editorial control over ESPN’s 30 for 30.
The makers of the documentary could have covered the allegedly bloody sock or not, and they could have covered his dealings with Rhode Island or not.
That decision is up to the producers and we all have the choice not to watch.