Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

That’s one of about 50 definitions of a bowie knife.

Check this out. http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=168603

Post 8 is especially interesting.

If guys on a knife forum, who seem to have some expertise cannot agree on a common definition, how can a law possibly be written to give police and prosecutors a leg to stand on and limit the citizenry thereof?

The actual “Bowie” knife is lost to history but is rumored to be more of a small sword with an 18” or so blade. Thus, the law should be more tightly defined.


26 posted on 05/02/2016 8:03:38 AM PDT by cyclotic (Liberalism is what smart looks like to stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: cyclotic

I have an OLD WEST (or True West, Frontier times) magazine with an article on the SMITHWICK BOWIE. It is claimed to be taken from the original pattern for the first Bowie knife.
The handle is six inches long, the blade is 11 inches long, 2 inches wide with a “clip” on the point of the blade. A simple flat hilt. Nothing fancy like many of the Bowie knives made for movies.

I made a couple of them for myself, they are heavier than a .44 Mag pistol, so I made another from an old machete blade. Much lighter.


28 posted on 05/02/2016 8:30:18 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: cyclotic

I think the Arkansas Toothpick would be a more “agressive” knife. Looks much like a sykes fairbairn dagger of WWII.


29 posted on 05/02/2016 8:36:55 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson