Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food; GregNH
I conclude from those two constitutional provisions that the electors are to choose a president who possesses those constitutional qualifications.

How are electors supposed to know the constitutional qualifications are met?
Is it the elector's responsibility, the candidate's or the Party's?

317 posted on 05/01/2016 8:30:48 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
I have researched this topic immensely since 2008. I have an "opinion" that this particular section, NBC clause, was added by honorable men for honorable men. I can imagine that one who was not qualified would simply not run. But because was have reached a point where the common knowledge of the times when the above might be true is now special knowledge, or less common. Our press, however, has a responsibility to investigate as they would of back then, but we do not have a "press" as we had back then either.

But US Code has a process as I have described above for the instance of verifying qualifications. We somehow somewhere along the line stopped the process prematurely.

319 posted on 05/01/2016 8:43:31 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
How are electors supposed to know the constitutional qualifications are met?

Well, according to the Founders, they are supposed to investigate the candidates and deliberate before voting. This was discussed in the Federalist Papers, No. 68, regarding the function of presidential electors:

"It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations."

As indicated in Federalist No. 68, the Founders were confident that the electors could pick qualified persons to be president:

"The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."

Like I said, the only people who want to change the system are people who just don't like a particular choice that the electors have made for reasons having nothing to do with the Constitution. But, it doesn't matter. They are few in number.

323 posted on 05/01/2016 8:53:56 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson