All else is Swiss baloney. ;-)
“Both Chester Arthur and Obama meet my definition of natural born citizens. Our history records that Arthur was born in Fairfield, Vermont and Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.”
Your definition is irrelevant to the actual applicable rule of law. My definition is irrelevant to the actual applicable law. What is relevant is the actual law and lawful precedents.
Chester Arthur was born without any U.S. citizenship, but he was born in Vermont as a British subject and only as a British subject. He was retroactively naturalized as a U.S. citizen by an act of Congress many years after his birth in Vermont. His father was a British subject born in Ireland and emigrated to British Canada. His mother was a U.S. citizen until she expatriated her natural born citizenship in the U.S. by her marriage to a British subject, William Arthur, in Canada and established her residence in Canada as a British subject. her first child was born in Canada as a British subject, after which the family moved to Vermont to live as British subject immigrants in Vermont. Chester Arthur was then born in Vermont as an alien British subject with two British subject parents. Although the later act of Congress retroactively granted blanket naturalization to such persons as Chester Arthur born within the United States with alien pareents, his naturalized citizenship disqualified any possibility whatsoever of Chester Arthur being a natural born citizen of the United States. Hence the Electors in the Electoral College unknowingly and unlawfully voted an alien born and naturalized U.S. citizen as Vice President of the United States.
“Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.”
Obama repeatedly published the actual fact that he was born in Kenya for many for about fifteen years before he changed his story to campaign for POTUS. In any event, Barack Hussien Obama’s legal father of record was not a U.S. citizen as required to qualify as a natural born citizen of the United States and for eligibility as POTUS. Barack Hussein Obama’s mother was not old enough to qualify her son for the acquisition of naturalized U.S. citizenship, and a mother’s U.S. citizenship is insufficient in any event o qualify a child as a natural born citizen of the U.S. The purported Hawaiian birth certificate is a fraudulent document with no more authenticity than a brown paper grocery bag with the words birth certificate scrawled on it in multi-colored Crayola crayons.
“All else is Swiss baloney. ;-)”
Your objections are even more fake than Obama’s cartoonish Hawaiian birth certificate.