Posted on 04/30/2016 9:58:30 AM PDT by lowbridge
Make no mistake, the “intent” was to incite a series of escalating riots that would culminate with the cancellation of finals......
It caused great calumny, not a calamity.
L
Only a whitey would get charged, just blacks did it so it’s just fine and dandy apparently.
So the race hustlers still found a way to blame whites, (the police), for the situation, because they told the truth about the suspects.
Thank you, I was about to say much the same although I could have used 'clamor' or 'cacophony' as well. I do regret the missing editors and grammar-checkers that used to have a job. However it appears that in this day, passing spell-check is sufficient- argh!
It greated on me.
L
No charges, huh. If it was any other race, they’d be charged with that and every other trumped up charge they could think up. But, yeah, only black lives matter.
HA! I made the call at the time... one more fake hate crime... I’m starting to think there aren’t ANY real hate crimes happening...
Fake hate crimes are actually hate crimes. They hate the group of people they are framing.
They are attempting to frame innocent people. Hey are atempting to incite violence. They are attempting to foment hostility between groups of people they are using as patsies in their lying scheme.
Isn't it amazing that federal law is scrupulously enforced whenever it suits the interests of a group favored by our elites?
Another faked hate crime for the list, what a shocker.
This incident is an example of what John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, had tried to prevent the states from doing with the equal protections clause of that amendment imo.
In this example, state actors are wrongly basing the punishment for a crime on the race of the people who do the crime.
It can also be argued that state actors are wrongly effectively establishing a privileged / protected class which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly prohibit both themselves and the feds from doing as evidenced by Clause 8 of Section 9 of Article I and Clause 1 of Section 10 also of Article I.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility [emphases added].
Was a police report filed?
Filing a false police report was still a crime last time I looked.
Agree.
Bears repeating.
To figure out who the slaves are, and who the slavers are, just look at who has to follow the rules, and who doesn’t.
YEs, the false flag du jour...
A travesty of justice. A deliberate refusal to prosecute for a crime. An unconstitutional discrimination.
A law that applies only to some is invalid and non-binding.
Race of professional victims at practice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.