Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: TroutStalker
I doubt that Second Amendment enemy obama would even want to be in the same room with a really-smart gun, especially on the day the gun became self-aware.
To: TroutStalker
Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldnt be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobodys even seen yet, said James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police. We have some very, very serious questions. Since Obama likes it so much - the men who protect Obama, Biden - the First Lady and other democrats should the guinea pigs...
56 posted on
04/28/2016 8:58:45 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Under Cruz every home will have a basketball ring, football net and a hockey glove- Willie Robertson)
To: TroutStalker; All
--
Like the debate on guns broadly, law enforcement leadership, which has been a key ally for gun control advocates, tends to be more open than their underlings to giving smart guns a try. --that term "underlings" says a lot to me---
57 posted on
04/29/2016 6:15:42 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: TroutStalker
I have no problem with this idea in theory, provided it is optional for the gun owner and not mandated by law. Of course details would need to be provided about how such a technology would work before I would ever decide to use it on my firearms. My capitalist side, however, would prefer the government stay out of the process and allow industry to innovate when the technology and demand are there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson