I had not really considered that position and you do have a point. However, Scott Brown, in my estimation does not fit your description of “someone worse for the NWO.” Scott is kind of a Christie like fluid weasel.
just going to toss some thoughts out here for perusal:
- I’m really not sure what Scott Brown brings to the table.
- I doubt Trump is going to view the position as the traditional sinecure that it is. Indications are that he’s going to pick someone who can help him navigate the politics of the Capitol - but there are so few choices in this area who aren’t establishment insiders, so that would be a challenge.
- Another option is to follow in Perot’s footsteps and choose a distinguished military figure as second. It didn’t help Perot, but didn’t hurt him either. On the other hand I can’t see Trump punting on this opportunity. His choice is likely to make a statement.
- He could double down and choose someone similar - perhaps even Ross Perot himself - and reinforce his message that way. Alternately he could double down on the political side and choose someone like Tom Tancredo.
- If he really wants to troll everyone, Rand Paul may be a possibility. He was the first competitor Trump singled out for elimination, so there’s a recognition that he may have been the most formidable opponent if he remained in the race longer.
- While it’s possible he may capitulate and name an establishment second, the legacy of Reagan’s mistake will probably not be lost on him, so I can’t see that happening.