Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration

Bull, she killed it with a clean shot between the eyes, that’s not callous indifference to pain and suffering. You are engaging in complete pretzel logic trying to claim there was anything that remotely falls into the “cruelty” category of this kill.

If someone is callously indifferent to pain and suffering of an animal, they aren’t going to go out of their way to kill it in a way that inflicts little to no pain or suffering.

There is absolutely nothing that equates to “cruelty” here, and rightly she was not charged with anything.


94 posted on 04/26/2016 1:42:14 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
You don't seem to grasp the fact that she was unconcerned with the actual suffering of the animal, since she could have missed the head and hit another part of the body.

It is cruelty by any normal definition of the word, since it was indifferent to the suffering to the animal she could have caused had she missed the head and hit another part of the body.

For her, it was a game and that is why she was bragging about it.

How many animals do we not know of where she missed and had to use more then one arrow?

Do you think this is the first time she has done this?

97 posted on 04/26/2016 1:48:59 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson