Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nearing affordable extraction of uranium from seawater which would unlock over 800 times current res
Next Big Future ^ | April 25, 2016 | Brian Wang

Posted on 04/25/2016 10:02:42 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Vince Ferrer
Then we need to stop the rivers from flowing into the oceans.

That will also help to keep the seas from rising and inundating the world's coastal regions due to Global Warming.

/sarc

21 posted on 04/25/2016 11:13:30 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

With all the radioactive waste flowing into the environment on a daily basis from Fukushima, I hope someone in nuke power is at least toying with the idea of removing a tiny part of the nuke industry pollution from the ocean.


22 posted on 04/25/2016 11:21:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

I wonder what kind of energy potential the element Thorium has in the long run?


23 posted on 04/25/2016 11:23:26 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Great post!


24 posted on 04/25/2016 11:27:38 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
What about the real issue of spent uranium fuel disposal safety? Understandably, the public has a low risk appetite for nuclear power in light of the ongoing Fukushima Japan nuke power plant disaster. Also, hasn’t it been established that nuclear power plants are very costly to operate over their 30 - 50 year life span? Are their currently any breeder reactors in use to compare costs with traditional pressurized vessel fission reactors?

I specified Generation 4 reactors. Look them up.

25 posted on 04/26/2016 12:06:07 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Even worse is the fact that ex Soviets who were around for Chernobyl are astounded by the fact that Japan has declared contaminated regions around Fukushima “safe” when in the old Soviet regime, those levels of radiation were deemed unlivable. Japan, the Soviet Union....they could not afford the cost of relocating entire regions and they didn’t have the land to do it so they declared contaminated areas “safe.”
In Japan that means the Government won’t compensate those whose homes and livelihood they have destroyed. Those wishing to leave contaminated regions must do so by leaving everything behind except the contaminated clothes on their backs and whatever health impacts they may have incurred.


26 posted on 04/26/2016 12:47:39 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Mercury is also used to capture gold from riverbeds.


27 posted on 04/26/2016 1:17:55 AM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Had me a ‘66 Chevelle with a 396/375 beefed up to 400 hp, big Holly double pumper, Muncie Rock Crusher 4 speed, 456 rear gears, big 50’s on the rear and glass packs.

Yeah, I understand.

Prius sucks donkey phallus.


28 posted on 04/26/2016 1:57:26 AM PDT by oldvirginian (American by birth, Southern by the grace of God and Virginian because Jesus loves me. CRUZ 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

“The rest of the world simply reprocesses nuclear materials “

As I recall our gigantic breeder reactor was stopped because it might kill some tiny fish. (Snail darter?) Of course, that was just an excuse. The suit winners bragged that if the smelt or darter or whatever approach failed they had a half dozen other “endangered” species to sue for.

The problem with all of our Congressionally approved large projects is that Congress makes them HUGE! They do that not because the project requires size to succeed; they do that because the bigger it is the more money they can send to supporters.

Take the average nuclear reactor. To get approval it requires gigantic size. Now shift gears, pull up your view to the upper atmosphere. The Earth is spread blue an azure below you. Now drift over to the Pacific where a storm has destroyed some Island’s power supply. The Navy rushes over a nuclear submarine or ship, connects a few cables and powers the Island. Now, drift into that sub or carrier and examine the nuclear reactor. It and all the support structure are relatively tiny when compared to the Congressionally approved land version. Why? Money. Graft. Payola.


29 posted on 04/26/2016 3:23:52 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Oh it would work, but the sewers might back up...


30 posted on 04/26/2016 3:26:23 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Sad really since Jimmy had some background in nuclear power as a bubblehead.


31 posted on 04/26/2016 3:32:50 AM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fella

If gold can be extracted from the ocean economically, the supply will be unlimited and the value will diminish accordingly. Uranium at $500/kg is about $15 per ounce. Artificial controls, such as those on diamonds, would be needed to keep the price high.


32 posted on 04/26/2016 4:13:17 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

The reactor on a sub runs on pure U-235. That’s both much more expensive and much more dangerous than unenriched or mildly enriched uranium a civilian nuclear plant burns.


33 posted on 04/26/2016 4:54:08 AM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“Can analogous techniques be used to get thorium from the water?”

Yes it can. The use of biological materials to adsorb materials is called Biosorption and I worked on this process as a new hire at a Corporate Research lab >30 years ago. I was testing the ability of bacteria, chitin and other bio-materials to remove U238 from seawater. It was very effective and very rapid. The literature at the time indicated that the process worked best with higher Atomic weight elements, including thorium. I predict the researchers will run into the same problems I did. The absorption is not very specific, the material doesn’t just bind Uranium, but a wide variety of other elements reducing the effectiveness of the absorbent. They will also find that putting the absorbent into non-sterile water will result in rapid bio-fouling of the membrane that will destroy its effectiveness.


34 posted on 04/26/2016 5:55:03 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

FUKUSHIMA

just dont let GE participate


35 posted on 04/26/2016 9:02:55 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
Thanks Vince Ferrer.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


36 posted on 04/27/2016 6:26:51 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Solvable most likely by the West. And would require scientific and moral “standards” in it’s development, therefore automatically to be rejected by the left.

Forget it. Won’t happen.


37 posted on 04/27/2016 7:32:34 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson