Wasn’t there a similar case of a gay bakery that refused to bake a cake for a traditional marriage celebration? But in that case, the same court that ruled against the normal bakery, ruled for the pervert bakery.
I had never heard that incident, but if that was the case, it’s a clear indication of judicial activism and ignoring the equal rights clause.
It was the committee or whatever, not the court, as I recall. The same tier 1 legal entity though.