You already did draw a conclusion that Walsh was possibly violating the 14th Amendment protections of staff members who got the “assignment” of listening to them despite the substantiated testimony that he was not the one who did that, and which is no way to serve on a jury. And you have to go with the evidence that you have, not what you speculate may be "out there," which it seems you are desiring.
The director of human resources sent an email giving his colleagues the "assignment" of listening to his sermons. Then the department left a voicemail on the doctor's machine, letting him know his employment was terminated. The most insulting part, however, came when they did not hang up the phone, but mocked him after thinking the call was over. One of the callers said, "you can't preach that and work in the field of public health," Walsh recalled. 
Moreover, The religious freedom bill could protect persons such as Walsh from state which make or enforce laws which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States by punishing them for their religious or ideological views expressed off the job, such as upheld traditional morality versus destructive ethos of modern social engineering.