And I responded to your post with respect. But you seem to have ignored it. So I will take this to the next level.
Explain to me, what did I miss? Please incorporate Jim’s reply in post 120 in your response
I’m sorry, but if you don’t remember that you posted #184 after #120, then I have no way or addressing your inability to understand.
Seriously. Instead of going with Jim’s post, you’ve decided to take it to a completely different direction. A direction of punishment rather than strategy.
I can’t help you with that.