Posted on 04/23/2016 6:32:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Well, my local sporting goods store has a gun range in the basement. It's really nice. Behind the line it's made up to look like a hunting lodge. Sometimes I go down there just to observe.
Five years ago most people on the range looked like some version of Jed Clampett (and that includes me). Now there's a lot of young women. Sometimes the majority of the shooters on the line are young women.
Chelsea Clinton: Mom will change the Supreme Court into the Clinton Foundation Lawyers
The little Nazi speaks. Sorry biatch. You can’t “change” the Bill of Rights. You need to make America “a better place” and move your ugly ass to North Korea.
Chelsea’s comments ought to scare the crap out of anyone that actually believes constitution means something. Her words, naive as they sound, are stunning. The SCOTUS not intended to make/twist law to fit a socialist agenda as the left seems to think. It’s is there to interpret existing law and settle legal disputes when there is a disagreement of that interpretation. We are doomed as a free nation if Hillary or Bernie gets into the White House. I’m not even comfortable for them to be there even as a visiting tourist.
Hillary Clinton Assassination Comment Kennedy Obama Shocking
"....Lyin must be part of their DNA"
Look at it this way, if I were one of these politicians, I would want absolute gun control as in confiscation.
I read that ALL former VA governors, including now-Sen. Kaine, acknowledged that what McAuliffe has attempted to do here thru an Executive Order violates the VA Constitution. Apparently Kaine had a formal opinion on the matter.
I would imagine action will be taken against this. McAuliffe’s hope probably is that his EO will be in effect in November, and after that he just doesn’t care.
If her mother is elected, I doubt she'll let the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, or anything else stop her agenda.
And she isn't going to jail before the elections, so we'll have to beat her on the issues.
If you really advocated for women you would encourage them to buy a gun and learn to use it. You would also demand public restrooms for women only.
I love it when these commie libs openly admit that the SCOTUS has absolutely nothing in common with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. SCOTUS is just another two bit tool for the political activists.
Hard to imagine they allow that most unattractive and fairly tone deaf politically person out on the campaign trail. She makes her mother look beautiful.
You know what, I'm sure you're a busy girl so I'll help you out there Chelsea - don't bother. You won't find any because it has never happened. Every place that is large enough to be statistically significant that has implemented "gun control" or bans or confiscation etc. has seen an increase in crime - even gun related crime! These increases aren't just transient either, they have been significant and sustained.
Now Chelsea, I realize this may be hard for your libtard-indoctrinated brain to comprehend but it really is quite simple. There are two driving factors, two irrefutable and un-alterable realities that make this result not only predictable, but inevitable. One, firearms are not just used for criminal activities but also by law-abiding people to defend themselves. Take away law abiding citizens' firearms and they are that much less effective at defending themselves - crime increases. Two, when you take away law abiding citizens' firearms, then only the criminals have firearms. Even the criminals without firearms realize their potential victims no-longer have them. This is a boon for criminals and emboldens them to increased criminal activity.
So Chelsea dear, the cold hard truth is "gun control" has not, does not, and never will make anyone any safer. Well, other than criminals. So, now that you are aware of the facts, any continued advocacy for "gun control" would indicate that you are not interested in public safety, but instead something else - a disarmed populace. Now why would big-government control-freak fascist wannabes want a disarmed populace... I'm going to guess it is not to enhance freedom and liberty...
Wait, wait... don’t tell me. Her private security force is unarmed, right? /s
Not bloody likely, given the hundreds of millions of dollars in the Clinton Foundation. That money will ensure the Clintons will have personal security guards down the generations.
Is Chelsea still receiving her $300K salary from the Clinton foundation or is she on leave?
May be a bit tough to do from behind bars.
Hillary be like “Legacy? I’ll show you a legacy!”
If she gets her way will her security people carry sticks and pepper spray?.
The only reason any government wants its people disarmed is to be able to do things to them that they would not tolerate if they were armed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.