Anyone can walk in there anytime they want to and victimize anyone they are able to right now everywhere in the world.
They can do this in the ladies room and they can do it in the men’s room. They can do it in the family room and in the dressing room. They can do this in any room. or in the park. Or at the beach.
The criteria for the probability of this happening is not whether someone is a transgender, it’s whether or not they are a criminal.
If people want to open their restrooms to transgender people, I respect that.
If people don’t want to open their restrooms to transgender people, I respect that.
But I don’t want to assume that a person is a violent sex criminal until a person demonstrates that capacity.
Sex criminals come in all shapes, sizes and genders, and they look like people.
[[Anyone can walk in there anytime they want to and victimize anyone they are able to right now everywhere in the world.]]
Not legally they can’t- a man isn’t allowed i na woman’s bathroom right now- or a locker room, or a shower room or a changing room- and while yesw, they ‘could’ walk in, the likely hood that htey will is much much lower right now because of the law- however, if we allow men into bathrooms- there won’t be any sense of alarm before an attack happens- stripping women of even that basic right of self defense- YES- self defense- as it is now, a man walks into a bathroom, and women are immediately on alert- and will be able to legally call the authorities or security and have hte man removed- IF however, the law states a man can use same bathroom- She is NOT allowed to call and report him until it’s too late-
[[Sex criminals come in all shapes, sizes and genders, and they look like people.]]
That is true- so why the hell would we want ot INCREASE the chances of it happening? Should we be doing everything in our power to prevent it from happening i n the first place?
This is no different than allowing gay boyscout leaders to lead children- everyone said “Nothing’s going to happen’ and ‘we respect their right to lead’, and ‘everyoen is just over-reacting’ Yet gay sexual assaults have icnreased sicne they implemented this new rule-
[[The Oregon Supreme Court, in June 2012, ordered the Boy Scouts to release more than 1,247 confidential files used in a 2010 molestation case. ]]
http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Boy_Scouts
Gsay rapes are way up in the military sicne don’t ask don’t tell was repealed- That is a faCt- Everyone said hten too owing gay boyscout leaders to lead children- everyone said “Nothing’s going to happen’ and ‘we respect their right to lead’, and ‘everyone is just over-reacting’
You may respect business owners supporting this perverted practice of unisex bathrooms- but many many people do not-
[[But I don’t want to assume that a person is a violent sex criminal until a person demonstrates that capacity.]]
The problem is you are referring to individual people- not the group as a whole- the group as a whole HAS demonstrated they are mentally ill- they are perverts, they do cause problems, they do engage in sexual abuse- and remember, we are not just talking about allowing trannies in bathrooms opposite their sex- if men are allowed in you will also have another group- several other groups infact, who HAVE demonstrated a much much higher proclivity to sexual assaults
Again- the goal in society is to reduce the risk that our women and children will be raped, molested, murdered etc- and it behooves us to do everything we can to make sure that groups with a known higher chance of criminal activity aren’t allowed free access to potential victims such as young children -
See post 111. You are just plain wrong.