To: SeekAndFind
I never understood this while standing concept. Wouldn’t any citizen have the potential to be “injured” by a person executing and signing laws that would govern him/her, especially if that person was not eligible for the office? One would think therefore that any citizen would have standing on this issue.
58 posted on
04/22/2016 11:45:12 AM PDT by
usafa92
(Trump 2016 - Destroying the GOPe while Making America Great Again)
To: usafa92
Wouldn’t any citizen have the potential to be “injured” by a person executing and signing laws that would govern him/her, especially if that person was not eligible for the office? You have to be able to articulate and demonstrate an injury to you that is separate and clearly identifiable apart from the general injury that would be suffered by the public at large in order to have standing.
61 posted on
04/22/2016 11:50:34 AM PDT by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: usafa92
"I never understood this 'no standing' concept. Wouldn’t any citizen have the potential to be “injured” by a person executing and signing laws that would govern him/her, especially if that person was not eligible for the office? One would think therefore that any citizen would have standing on this issue."You are absolutely correct. The "no standing" garbage is just a way for the black robed cowards and traitors to dodge the issue.
64 posted on
04/22/2016 12:03:03 PM PDT by
Godebert
(CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson