Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rashputin

“Interesting. I have several friends who were in the Navy and who were told that when born in the base hospital, their children were no different than a child born inside the US on a military base, i.e. natural born with no need for them to send mommy home to have the child.”

Total myth and well documented as a myth.

“Are there differences between the Navy and other services since a US ship is always considered part of the US just like land within any state is ?”

That statement is totally and utterly wrong. The U.S. Supreme Court decisions have established that birth within the jurisdiction of the United States of America requires the birth to occur within the incorporated territories of the United States and within the jurisdiction of the Article III Federal Courts and not in the Federal territorial courts established in unincorporated U.S. territories or the courts martial of the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government.


257 posted on 04/30/2016 2:53:54 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX
Some friends who have children while in the military probably won't be disappointed anyway since their kids aren't on the "President of the US before I'm fifty" track, in fact, they're not even lawyers or Harvard grads.

I always thought it was US soil which means the actual place someone was born was the most important thing, not one or both parents being a citizen. If Cruz didn't fear that's what the courts would rule based on precedent, he'd wouldn't have any reason to have his records sealed, that's my opinion.

265 posted on 04/30/2016 4:33:03 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson