Absent followership to court decisions, one has anarchy.
The BLM crowd believes most homes in the South, even modern ones, or at least the land under them, were acquired through illegal slave labor, so 30% of all homes should be given to Blacks... for free.
The Indians (”Native Americans”) believe it’s all theirs.
The courts do not agree with them, but since you claim that “The fact that the courts agree or disagree on anything is irrelevant,” are you ready to move out now?
If you reply that guns, etc, are the answer.... P.S, they have guns too!
Really? Watching the courts for many decades now, I can reasonably conclude that we pretty much have anarchy anyways.
Homo marriage? Abortion on Demand? Kelo? Lawrence? Anchor Babies? Bake the Cake? Obamacare?
What isn't anarchy?
The BLM crowd believes most homes in the South, even modern ones, or at least the land under them, were acquired through illegal slave labor, so 30% of all homes should be given to Blacks... for free.
The courts do not agree with them, but since you claim that “The fact that the courts agree or disagree on anything is irrelevant,” are you ready to move out now?
What makes this funny is the trend in the courts going in this very direction. I will not be at all surprised if some goofy Judge or Judges decides they have a case and orders reparations or evictions. It would be the Cherry topper on a long legacy of idiotic and ridiculous court decisions.
If you reply that guns, etc, are the answer.... P.S, they have guns too!
Not a problem. They don't have as many, nor do as many have the skills to use them to the extent necessary.
This seems like a good time to quote that one Army Ranger who was confronted by some gang members. (Up in Seattle, I think.)
" I and all my friends are trained professional killers. The current legal state of affairs does a lot more to protect you from us than it ever did to protect us from you."