Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Not necessarily mutually exclusive.

It is a State’s Rights issue,,but that doesn’t mean the law passed was stupid/or great. Trump can have an opinion on that law without stepping on the rights of the state.

See the difference?


96 posted on 04/21/2016 8:24:27 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: austinaero
Do you see the difference?

He's running for POTUS. The question was:

“Mr. Trump, please be specific. Tell us your views on LGBT, how you plan to be inclusive as president. Speak about North Carolina bathroom law in particular,"
His first answer was that NC shouldn't have passed such a law because things are fine the way they are and requiring new bathrooms would be expensive and discriminatory.

Hours later, he says it's a states' rights issue.

"NC shouldn't do that" is the opposite of "NC should do whatever it wants."

I'd agree with you if he had said, "I oppose NC's position on the law, but it is their legal right to take that position." But he didn't say that.

167 posted on 04/21/2016 9:43:28 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson