Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PistolPaknMama

Actually, any “duty to assist” would have to absolve the assister of liability for any mistakes made.

It’s the reason why one shouldn’t perform CPR if not CURRENTLY certified to perform it.


10 posted on 04/21/2016 10:50:31 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

Illinois has a Good Samaritan law.

L


22 posted on 04/21/2016 11:20:22 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MortMan

good Samaritan laws do this.


32 posted on 04/21/2016 11:41:11 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MortMan

That’s BS. If you know CPR and can administer it compentently then you should. Why would you let someone die because you do not have a government blessed piece of paper? Can you cite one instance were a Good Samaritan has been forced to pay damages for administering CPR?

Do I need to be certified in water rescue to save a drowning person? Do I need to be certified in using a fire extinguisher before using one?

I guess you would join the Chicago crowd and watch the person die even if you could save them via CPR?


36 posted on 04/21/2016 11:49:21 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson