Similarly, I don't think a majority of Republicans feel a woman should be forced to continue a pregnancy that will kill her.
Incest is spoken of rarely, but I actually live near an area where it is disgracefully prevalent. A 12 year old girl impregnated by a retarded 17 year old brother... you're gonna make her carry it?
These are not easy situations in real life. On paper, there are easy logical answers. But not in real life.
Moreover, the President has zero ability to do anything about it!
False Premise Review Time — (not picking on anyone, just need to point out something important) —
Instead of advocating for loopholes and exceptions, which is an anti-life position whatever the cause of pregnancy and shows NO mercy for the living unborn, (which demonstrably feel pain and respond to positive and negative stimuli)—
HOW ABOUT a premise that the LAW will be enforced? Not crappy “case law” - real tort law.
How about swift sure unapologetic execution of rapists, including the criminally insane? The infamous Communist Goals include putting law enforcement in the hands of shrinks, away from the Constitutional legal system. How’s that working out for the USA?
Medicine has advanced—few mothers actually risk life in childbirth—the risk is a consequence that they must themselves bear, beginning back in Genesis chapter 3.
Permitting a “final solution” based on the alleged prevalence of need for the ‘medical exception’—
—as may be grossly exaggerated and loosely defined by unscrupulous quacks with financial and political vested interests—
AND grouped with the unpunished aftermath of criminal behavior (rape) is a manipulative Hegelian, Alinsky propaganda technique all too many have fallen for.