Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arl295

And take William McKinley off of it?

Removing Jackson is fine. It was an inside slight towards to the man to put him on a Federal Reserve Note anyway since he was such an opponent to a national bank.

And Tubman is a good choice. In fact, we should be changing the notes more frequently, not once every 90 years. I would say to keep Washington on the $1 note, but everyone else is changeable.


7 posted on 04/21/2016 7:38:17 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
And Tubman is a good choice.

Was Tubman's contribution to our nation's history as significant and indispensable as any of the men whose portraits now appear on our currency? No, it was not.

In fact, we should be changing the notes more frequently, not once every 90 years. I would say to keep Washington on the $1 note, but everyone else is changeable.

In other words, every few years we'll be replacing Founding Fathers and other historically significant figures with politically correct footnotes to history. Here's a likely scenario: out with Franklin, in with Cesar Chavez or Harvey Milk on the $100. No thanks.

28 posted on 04/21/2016 8:12:30 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson