Replies

The law as it stands RIGHT NOW in NC is that men are not allowed to enter women’s restrooms.

Now if Trump is saying leave that as it is, then you have no argument.

If he is saying leave what was before in place, then he saying that prior state laws should be left in place that gave no protections to LGBTQ perverts. Again, you have no argument.

Trump is eyeing California on June 7 which is what will win him the nomination. The Bay Area is crawling with political correctness maggots not only among the voters but among the voting officials. For them to hear him side with the North Carolina Governor would likely cause him to lose enough delegates to put his nomination in jeopardy. There are too many other issues that override this one to consider.

Suppose the perfect conservative president is elected, this issue will not be resolved. This issue is emerging as the next item of civil rights-social justice-cultural marxism and no president, even a perfect one will stop the Supreme Court from wreaking havoc on the moral sensitivities of Americans.

What has to happen is the ultimate fallback position. An assembly of states that meets for the purpose of proposing and ratifying amendments to the US Constitution according to Article V. Nothing else but this pathway will resolve these issues, nothing.

Trump is going to have to tow the states rights line because there is no recourse. He’s not going to be signing any law affording perverts to play with American traditions because there won’t be any such law even if democrats take back Congress. It’s all going to be through the courts and there’s nothing he can do in that regard.

You might say well...he will be appointing justices to the Supreme Court. There is absolutely no lock on anyone doing the right thing in that arena, absolutely none.

Ronald Reagan appointed Anthony Kennedy who gave us normalization of perversion which has led to relentless persecution and prosecution of Christians.

G.W. Bush appointed John Roberts who gave us a tax on healthcare that will usher in socialism.

Ted Cruz in his 2005 National Review op-ed stated:

“At the outset, Judge Roberts is brilliant. A summa cum laude Harvard graduate”

“Judge Roberts is a lawyers’ lawyer. And that matters immensely, especially for the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Cruz concludes the op-ed writing:

“The Senate should confirm him swiftly.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/214989/right-stuff-ted-cruz

The promotion and exaltation of Roberts by Cruz should indicate even to the slowest of the slow that Cruz is no savior to conservatives.

And now we have Donald Trump and his view of who should be seated on the Supreme Court, and noting his public statement that Clarence Thomas is his favorite Supreme Court Justice, I will say he is no savior as well, why? Let’s review:

After a warm, respectful but non-serious mention of his pro-abortion sister, he entered a consulting agreement with the Heritage Foundation to choose justices from their list and only their list while publicly making the promise that he would never appoint a liberal justice. Sounds great yeah? Let’s continue:

He then mentioned two justices he would strongly consider for the Supreme Court, Judge William Pryor and Judge Diane Sykes, both of whom give the left a hard case of constipation.

For example, Judge Pryor is described as:

“Judge William Pryor was what is euphemistically referred to as a “controversial nominee” when President George W. Bush announced his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. His opponents pointed to statements Pryor made as Alabama Attorney General labeling Roe v. Wade and the Supreme Court’s landmark criminal justice decision in Miranda v. Arizona as “the worst examples of judicial activism.” Pryor also described Roe as creating “a constitutional right to murder an unborn child.” Senate Democrats initially filibustered Pryor’s nomination, but they eventually capitulated to a Republican threat to eliminate the filibuster unless Pryor was confirmed.”

And the background of Judge Diane Sykes is even worse as it further gives the left an aftereffect of neverending diarrhea.

So it looks like Donald Trump is going to save America from its flush down the drain from Justices of perversion and continuous social injustice by choosing reliable pillars of conservative justice. Not so fast.

There are many great rulings and positions of Judges Pryor and Sykes but there is one little blurb about Justice Pryor that shows just how precarious it can be to choose a conservative justice. Here it is:

“He joined a 2011 opinion holding that “a government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity.”

So there it is. Judge Pryor is an ultra-Orthodox conservative judge with an apparent flaw.

What does this tell us? It tells us there is no savior among politicians. Even among smart businessmen-turned-politicians.

Why would we want Cruz? Because he’s a principled conservative? He’s a fraud. Two words only are needed: “Neil Bush”.

Is Cruz going to save us from LGBTQ? Hell No!

Why would we want Donald Trump? Here you go:

$20 Trillion Debt
Mothballing of entire segments of American industry
Border, Border, Border
Wall, Wall, Wall
Jobs X 3 too
Immigration Reform
Ending Birthright Citizenship
Vets (my #1) and Military
Tax Reform, Banking Reform, Auditing the Fed
Smart Trade
Political Campaign Transparency
Healthcare Reform
Rights of Farmers and Ranchers

and a few more from Helicondelta ....

Pro life since at least 2011, wanted to ban partial birth abortion as far back as 2000.
Says no funds for Planned Parenthood, while they do abortions.
Pro Traditional marriage. “Gay rights is not my thing.”
Pro capital punishment “Capital punishment isn’t uncivilized; murderers living is”
Hold Judges accountable
Opposes “Common core is a diaster” Teach citizenship, quit “dumbing down”.
Anti education unions (2000)
For school choice
“Climate Change is a hoax”
“No Cap-and-Tax”
For drilling our own.
On Environment “Good development enhances the environment”
Stressed the importance of a strong family & culture of life (2015)
Supports Israel
Opposes Iran deal and letting Iran obtain the bomb.
Wants to crush ISIS quickly.
Wants a military so strong no one will challenge us.
Against unbalanced trade deals that kill American jobs.
Against warrantless government surveilance of citizens.
Is against having a high national debt. Warns that $24T is a point of no return.
Againt gun control
For assault weapon ban but says the AR-15 shouldn’t be considered an assault weapon.
Wants to repeal Obamacare and replace it with market driven polices and increased competition among insurance companies.
Wants to increase military spending.
Will close the border to illegals
Will send the criminals and sponges back.
Will deport all illegals but will let the hard working ones go through the legal process to come back.
Against Anchor babies
Knows unemployment is much higher than official stats.
Will bring jobs back through better trade negotiation.
Attended military academy and Wharton Business School.
Stood up for Birthers and challenged Obama on his fraud.
Believes USA is “the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known”
Wants to honor commitments on Social Security and Medicare, which we can afford to do if he gets the economy going full steam.
Wants to reduce the fraud in disability and other programs.
Against marriage penalties in tax code.
Wants to reduce income taxes and eliminate corporate tax.
Wants to rebuld our infrastructure.
Wants to apply welfare-to-work to 76 other welfare programs (2011)
Doesn’t have time for political correctness.
Not afraid to call out either party or both when they are wrong.
Not a puppet to campaign donators.

And I suppose Ted Cruz would say he’s all of the above too but there’s one thing about Cruz that is concerning ....

He’s only 44, has rarely held a job outside government and doesn’t know how to get things done ... oh, and “Neil Bush”.