Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newfreep

It’s not right. Unfortunately, our SCOTUS would probably agree it is. I think this is the reason I am seeing more businesses here in Wisconsin going with non-gender single bathrooms. No multiple stalls. Mr Trump was stating the huge negative financial impact it has had on NC.

This was used as a “gotcha” question. It will not affect my view or vote for Trump in any way.

We have much bigger fish to fry!


117 posted on 04/21/2016 9:12:26 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: mouse1

I agree. For new construction, it can’t be much more expensive to just provide individual unisex stalls with doors and be done with all this nonsense. Everyone would like it better to have more privacy and there would be offsetting cost savings because so much space in existing restrooms is wasted empty space. Make each one wide enough for a wheelchair and that problem is solved as well. As a builder I’d rather hear Trump propose common-sense ideas like this.

I could only take a few minutes of Rush but he’s blabbering about how ignorant Trump must be to not understand Harriet Tubman was a Republican and transgender nonsense. He has really become obsolete, sitting there carrying on one-sided conversations with himself about what Ed Morrisey wrote that anyone can just go read for themself.


124 posted on 04/21/2016 9:25:11 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: mouse1

I’ll continue to support Trump...but he made a mistake in his PC answer.

This will hurt him in Indiana.


127 posted on 04/21/2016 10:03:21 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson