I think no such thing. The party in Colorado is, I suppose, like parties in every other state, depends heavily on activists. Those are the people who invest time and money. Did Trump even try to get these people on his side? Trump has surged ahead by ginning up enthusiasm. But how were of these were the enthusiasts of 2009 who then became amateur politicians who did the nitty gritty work of organizations that collectively became know as the Tea Party movement? The ground game actually consist largely in making yourself known to such people. To get them to think of your candidate as a reasonable choice. You defame them by talking about them as pawns, just as Trump does by objecting to wining and dining them. This is the sort of politics that has sheen going on since the time that George Washington rolled out the barrel for voters in his day. Voters who, by the way, were relatively the same sort as the people in Colorado.
It is amusing that your entire post had absolutely nothing to do with anything that I posted. I mentioned Wyoming, you changed the state to Colorado. I never said anything about what you “think”. We do not seem to be able to communicate through the written word. I have no clue what you are thinking. You went on a meaningless rant I suppose trying to equivocate for Cruz’s blatant and continuing attempts to disenfranchise millions of voters.