Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

Still though Cruz had more viable opponents on March 1 than Trump did on April 19.


78 posted on 04/20/2016 7:50:53 AM PDT by Theodore R. (I shudder to think what the American people will do on November 8, 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
It shouldn't have mattered in terms of one's home state. Cruz is a sitting senator from Texas. He already had existing political infrastructure throughout the state to operate his primary campaign. He had the endorsements of Perry and Abbot. Trump got 27% and Rubio 18%.

Cruz's percentage of the vote total was one of the lowest in recent history for a Rep candidate in his home state. He should have been much closer to 50%.

Kasich got 47% in Ohio. Cruz finished third in NY while Trump finished second in Texas. Cruz also finished well back in Ohio (13%) behind Kasich and Trump. In fact, Cruz received 440,000 fewer votes than Trump and almost 700,000 less than Kasich.

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig. Cruz got destroyed in NY and no amount of rationalization can change the facts. Cruz under-performed in NY.

81 posted on 04/20/2016 8:15:46 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson