“The Cruz supporters argued that Phyllis is senile and not in charge of Eagle Forum.”
Well when you endorse an unknown candidate , one who only
“says” he’s a republican and has no record or reference
to back it up, over a known conservative with a record that
does back it up, then I can see their concern for her mental
health.
Besides, when the first paragraph is all about convincing
the reader as to how conservative Phyllis Schlafly is
tells me that it may be questionable. Especially when she
endorses Trump over Cruz in a conservative comparison.
I think the bats bonkers.
She’s looking to what she believes is the likely result of the success of each candidate.
Cruz seems at best a crapshoot — I don’t know what other private agendas he has on his plate. Trump is pretty open about his populism, and we have no excuse for being ignorant about where the “average American” is. Right on some things, left on others, but on average to the right of where our perfidious government is, which will be an overall plus. And he’s not afraid to spill applecarts when he believes it is merited.
“Besides, when the first paragraph is all about convincing
the reader as to how conservative Phyllis Schlafly is
tells me that it may be questionable.”
You clearly have no clue about Phyllis Schlafly. It will take you hours to read her conservative accomplishments and mission.
She's just smarter than you when it comes to spotting Phonies like Cruz.