Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Both definitions passed citizenship paternally.

Paternally, eh? There's a chance that might have flown in 1716, but not in 2016!

60 posted on 04/17/2016 7:13:44 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody
Paternally, eh? There's a chance that might have flown in 1716, but not in 2016!

Different times, different customs. Whatever the case, legal definitions do not change with the customs... at least, that's how we used to think.

75 posted on 04/17/2016 7:38:21 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: cynwoody
There's a chance that might have flown in 1716, but not in 2016!

Statues and cultural decay cannot change original intent.

If a Constitutional amendment were to be proposed, they would probably have to adopt an entirely different term other than "natural born citizen".

86 posted on 04/17/2016 7:52:15 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson