This is a dumb comparison, since that difference in electors is precisely designed to limit the power of states with a higher population. IOW, it's designed to insure they aren't disenfranchised. It's also dumb for another reason, since it's apples and oranges. People in Colorado, the working class, etc., should have the right to determine who it is they support. Comparing a voterless election to an actual election in the general is just absurd.
“You don’t think the sparse amount of people in Wyoming don’t feel disenfranchised by the large number of electoral college voters in New York and California ?”
If they do they don’t understand arithmetic. The people of Wyoming have the highest impact on the electoral college, not the lowest—they have one electoral vote per 142,741 people. The people of CA have one electoral vote per 508,344 people, and New York gets one electoral vote per 519,075 people. The dilution of votes is much higher in heavily populated states.