Ahhh, rights vs. rights. The right to reprint for and use in their advertising vs the ownership rights.
IOW, depends on what "is", "is", per the same lawyer speak, Clinton game Ted plays all the time.
So you're saying Ted's pals reprinted the picture, spread it far and wide, and did so without paying the owner? Why aren't you yelling for Ted to reject help from such a dishonest bunch of thieves ?
Yer strawman ain't working Bub, the campaign paid for rights to reprint and use. Ownership isn't the question and has never been except for the spin doctors.
Wrong. See post 93.