Absolutely.
Some state parties have completely corrupted the vote.
.0114 - 4% vote participation from caucus states that are tightly controlled.
.0000001 of the population are contributed millions to buy an election.
Wealthy foreigners and global financiers are supporting our candidates.
The press over reports, under reports and redefines the message every day.
The system is not what it should be, but that is a problem that republicans should demand the state parties fix after November. In fact, Trump can make that demand and apply a huge amount of pressure if he wins in November.
However, it’s how candidates play the system that decides elections. If Trump had set a rather mild goal of 1,000 supporters spread over the Wyoming Caucuses, he could have swept the state. I don’t mind a lot that Cruz did it with the 644 supporters who showed up, since that limited Kasich to one delegate, but I would have preferred to see Trump make the effort to beat both rivals at that game.
I blame Trump for not playing the game under the rules he knows and for not doing his very best. Or does anyone believe Trump really could not have gathered more than 70 total supporters in that state?